Independent assurance report
on selected indicators in the Sustainability Report 2025/26 to the Board of Directors of Sonova Holding AG, Stäfa.
Zurich, May 13, 2026
We have been engaged to perform assurance procedures to provide limited assurance on selected indicators (including GHG emissions) included in Sonova Holding AGʼs and its consolidated subsidiariesʼ (the Groupʼs) Sustainability Report 2025/26 for the reporting period from 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026 (the Report).
Our limited assurance engagement focused on selected indicators (including GHG emissions) presented in the content indexes (GRI content index, ESRS content index and SASB content index) of the Report and marked with the check mark next to the KPIs in scope. We did not perform assurance procedures on other information included in the Report, other than as described in the preceding paragraph, and accordingly, we do not express a conclusion on that information.
Applicable criteria
The Group defined as applicable criteria (the Applicable Criteria):
- Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). A summary of the standards is presented on the GRI website.
- SASB Standards for the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry. A summary of the standards is presented on the SASB website.
- European Sustainability Reporting Standard (“ESRS”). The ESRS are presented in Annex I of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards.
- The Groupʼs own methodology available in the relevant sections of the Report and in the chapter “Sustainability notes”.
Inherent limitations
The accuracy and completeness of the selected indicators (including GHG emissions) are subject to inherent limitations given their nature and methods for determining, calculating and estimating such data. In addition, the quantification of the non-financial matters indicators is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine factors related to the emissions factors and the values needed to combine e.g. emissions of different gases. Our assurance report should therefore be read in connection with the Groupʼs “Sustainability notes” chapter including its definitions and procedures on non-financial matters reporting therein.
Responsibility of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors is responsible for the selection of the Applicable Criteria and for the preparation and presentation, in all material respects, of the selected indicators (including GHG emissions) in accordance with the Applicable Criteria. This responsibility includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation of the selected indicators (including GHG emissions) that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Independence and quality management
We have complied with the independence and other ethical requirements of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA Code), which is founded on fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behavior. Our firm applies ISQM 1, which requires the firm to design, implement and operate a system of quality management including policies or procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Our responsibility
Our responsibility is to express a conclusion on the selected indicators (including GHG emissions) based on the evidence we have obtained. We conducted our limited assurance engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (revised) Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information. This standard requires that we plan and perform this engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the selected indicators (including GHG emissions) are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Summary of work performed
Procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent than for a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a reasonable assurance engagement been performed. Our procedures were designed to obtain a limited level of assurance on which to base our conclusion and do not provide all the evidence that would be required to provide a reasonable level of assurance. Although we considered managementʼs internal controls when determining the nature and extent of our procedures, our assurance engagement was not designed to provide assurance on internal controls. Our procedures did not include testing controls or performing procedures relating to checking aggregation or calculation of data within IT systems. The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) quantification process is subject to scientific uncertainty, which arises because of incomplete scientific knowledge about the measurement of GHGs. Additionally, GHG procedures are subject to estimation (or measurement) uncertainty resulting from the measurement and calculation processes used to quantify emissions within the bounds of existing scientific knowledge.
Our limited assurance procedures included the following work:
- Assessment of the suitability of the Applicable Criteria and their consistent application
- Interviews with relevant personnel to understand the business and reporting process, including the sustainability strategy, principles and management
- Interviews with the Groupʼs key personnel to understand the sustainability or non-financial reporting system during the reporting period, including the process for collecting, collating and reporting the indicators
- Checking that the calculation criteria have been correctly applied in accordance with the methodologies outlined in the Applicable Criteria
- Analytical review procedures to support the reasonableness of the data
- Identifying and testing assumptions supporting calculations
- Testing, on a sample basis, underlying source information to check the accuracy of the data
We have not carried out any work on data other than outlined in the paragraph above. We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our assurance conclusions.
Conclusion
Based on the procedures performed and the evidence obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the selected indicators (including GHG emissions) in the Report of the Group have not been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the Applicable Criteria.
Ernst & Young Ltd
Raphael Rutishauser
Executive in charge
Martin Mattes
Partner